kinds of drugs and its side effects

Why BSL, Not Dogs, Should Be Banned

“Dog bites man” is not news — unless the dog belongs to a breed that has been declared dangerous, in which case the media is all over the story. In turn, the public response has often been to pass laws banning or restricting the breed.

But studies have shown that Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is unscientific and ineffective. Worse, breed discriminatory laws serve as a distraction from the main deterrent to dog attacks: Education about responsible dog ownership.

Emily Mc Cobb, DVM, head of Shelter Medicine at the Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine and a board member of the Tufts Center for Animals and Public Policy, says, “Owners need to learn about dog safety. The hype and the media storm that tend to surround dog bites keep us from getting at the root of the issue. Targeting a specific breed is not going to solve the problem.”

What are these laws — and how widespread are they?

BSL is a blanket term for a hodgepodge of laws relating to specific breeds, or breed categories, of dogs. They range from outright bans of these dogs to restrictions and conditions on ownership such as required registration with local animal control, or mandatory spay/neuter and microchip implants.

[stextbox id=”alert” caption=”Devil Dogs”]

Powerful dog breeds have been demonized throughout history. In the 19th century it was bloodhounds, believed to have been used to hunt down slaves in America and search for Jack the Ripper in London, that were feared and loathed. German shepherds and Doberman pinschers suffered for their association with the Gestapo during World War II, Rottweilers struck terror into moviegoers’ hearts in the 1990s after the debut of a horror film called “Man’s Best Friend…” The list goes on.

These days it’s the pit bull that gets a bad rap, largely because of its association with dog fighting rings. It wasn’t always so. Famous dogs that fall under the aegis of the pit bull label include World War I’s Sergeant Stubby, the most decorated dog in military history, and Petey on the original Little Rascals. RCA and Buster Brown shoes both used the breed in their commercials. Helen Keller and Teddy Roosevelt are among the many famous people who owned dogs identified as pit bulls.

The American Temperament Test Society determined that pit bulls were less aggressive in confrontational situations than many stereotypically friendly breeds, scoring 86% in overall ability to interact appropriately in public — versus the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel (83%), the Miniature Poodle (78%) and the Old English Sheepdog (77%).

[/stextbox]

Owners may be required to purchase liability insurance, typically up to $300,000 for a single incident. In some cases, classes of individuals such as convicted felons are prohibited from owning designated breeds.

Other laws restrict some breeds from access to public areas, or establish conditions, such as wearing a muzzle, for the dogs to be taken out in public. In some localities, owners must alert the public that dogs of the breed are resident in their homes.

Although pit bulls are currently the most commonly affected dogs, several other types are frequently targeted by BSL as well. The language of the ban that the city of Aurora, Colorado, enacted in 2005 is fairly typical:

 It [is] unlawful for any person to have, own, possess, keep, exercise control over, maintain, harbor, transport, or sell within the city any pit bull or restricted breed of dog.

“Pit bull” … is defined as any dog that is an American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the standards established by the American Kennel club or United Kennel Club for any of the above breeds.

“Restricted Breed Of Dog” shall mean any American Bulldog (Old Country Bulldog), Dogo Argentino, Canary Dog (Canary Island Dog, Presa Canario, Perro De Presa Canario), Presa Mallorquin (Perro de Presa Mallorquin, Ca De Bou), Tosa Inu (Tosa Fighting Dog, Japanese Fighting Dog, Japanese Mastiff), Cane Corso (Cane Di Macellaio, Sicilian Branchiero), Fila Brasileiro or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds.

In cities such as Denver, where pit bulls have been banned since 1989, dogs identified as belonging to the breed are confiscated and, often, killed. Based on animal control data, Denver’s Westword News estimated in 2009 that 3,497 pit bulls had been put down in the 20 years since the ban had been passed. The effect on the lives of people who own these dogs is more difficult to quantify.

Currently, only Ohio has a statewide breed-specific vicious dog law, but such legislation is widespread in individual counties and cities around the United States. Donald Cleary, Director of Communications and Publications of the National Canine Research Council, says, “The number of jurisdictions with breed specific restrictions in force fluctuates. For a presentation at the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Convention in 2009, we used the number 300, but that is only a rough estimate.”

Lisa Peterson, spokeswoman for the American Kennel Club, which tracks legislation affecting dogs throughout the country, concurs that it is impossible to keep track of these laws. “They change with the seasons,” Peterson says.

Like other major professional organizations concerned with public safety and animal affairs — they include the AVMA, The National Animal Control Association and the Centers for Disease Control — the AKC is opposed to BSL, which Peterson compares to racial profiling. She says, “When there is an incident in a local area, the reaction is to create a dangerous dog law, and sometimes lawmakers react with breed bans because that breed of dog that was involved in an incident. A law that targets a breed because a single dog was involved in an incident is not a good law.”

Why BSL doesn’t work

According to Nicholas Dodman, BVMS, DACVB, director of the Animal Behavior Clinic at Cumming School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, there’s no question that some breeds have a greater ability to inflict damage with bites than others. “To say that different breeds don’t have different tendencies is ridiculous,” Dr. Dodman says. “The bull dog types were bred for courage and tenacity, for helping butchers to get bulls under control. They are going to be much more committed to a bite than herding dogs, which were not permitted to harm the sheep historically.”

But there are numerous dogs besides pit bulls and other so-called dangerous breeds that are capable of causing harm. And a study by the University of Colorado School of Medicine conducted between 2003 and 2008 determined that unsupervised children ages five and younger are at the greatest risk for dog bites, and that family pets, including a high percentage of breeds considered “good” with children such as Labrador retrievers, are the most frequent offenders. The director of the study, Vikram Durairaj, MD, points out that, although a predisposition of a dog to bite is hereditary, that’s just one causal factor out of many. “Dog bites,” Dr. Durairaj says, “are also related to early experience, later socialization and training, health and victim behavior.”

Another key problem with BSL is a widespread inability to identify the breeds targeted with any degree of accuracy. Victoria L. Voith, DVM, Ph.D., DACVB, a professor of animal behavior at the College of Veterinary Medicine at Western University in Pomona, California, has studied breed identification extensively and concluded that visual assessment is inaccurate far more often than not, even among those who work with dogs regularly. “Shelter workers are generally 75 percent wrong when they guess the breed of a dog — and most do just guess,” Dr. Voith says. “The only sure-fire way of knowing a breed is DNA testing, which most shelters don’t use.” The average person — and most dog trainers — wouldn’t recognize a Dogo Argentino, Cane Corso, or other breeds cited in the Aurora, Colorado, ban if they fell over them.

A paper published in the October 1, 2010 issue of the Journal of American Veterinary Medicine analyzes other flaws in BSL, including the facts that it’s a fear-based response to very unreliable data about dog bites and that it has never been proven to work in other countries. Using a variety of statistical models, the authors concluded that thousands of dogs would need to be killed to eliminate even one serious bite, making it implausible for BSL to substantially decrease the number of dog bite-related injuries in a community.

Dr. Dodman notes that there will always be people who want dangerous dogs precisely because they are dangerous, but that banning a single breed is “completely mindless.”  “People who want fierce dogs will just go for another status ‘special’ breed if you ban one kind,” he says.

Alternatives to BSL

No one disputes that there should be laws to keep the public safe from harmful dogs. But AKC spokeswoman Peterson argues that these laws should be based on a fair process, established by the community, that identifies specific dogs as dangerous based on measurable actions that can be applied to any breed. And procedures to deal with dogs that have been proven dangerous, she argues, must include penalties imposed on irresponsible owners.

“We already have a lot of good laws on the books, but they’re not enforced,” Peterson says. “Many towns just don’t have enough resources or manpower. If leash laws were enforced, for example, you wouldn’t have dogs roaming around that could create a potential dangerous dog situation.”

Dr. Emily McCobb agrees. “We aren’t giving our animal control officers a leg to stand on,” she says. “We’re not putting enough resources into the problem.” She sees licensing as essential to promoting good dog ownership, and favors such ideas as strict differential licensing fees, with significant cost breaks for people who have their animals spayed and neutered.

As Dr. McCobb sees it, informing owners about good caretaking practices is the key. “We need to do more to educate families about getting the appropriate pet for their individual circumstances, and explain to them how to interact safely with their dogs,” she says. “Owners need to be responsible what’s going on in their house. I tell my children not to approach a strange dog. That’s just common sense.”

Dr. Dodman suggests a novel idea: In order to get a license for a dog, you would have to take a test, just as you are required to take a test to get a drivers license. “Maybe 10 questions about such issues as restraints and leash laws,” he muses. “If you want a license for a breed considered dangerous, you might have to answer questions dealing with particular care issues.”

There are virtually no experts who blame dogs for posing a public risk. “It’s a people problem far more than it is a dog problem,” says Dr. McCobb. “There are far more bad people than there are bad dogs.”

***

This article is a version of one I wrote for Your Dog, the newsletter of Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine at Tufts University, last year. The smiling sweetie pictured is from the Positively Pit Bull gallery of the Oh My Dog Blog.

This entry was posted in Animal Welfare and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

23 Comments

  1. Posted May 21, 2012 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    I couldn’t agree more, Edie. Wonderful article.

    On a much smaller scale, when I walk in the park near our home I watch the people who allow their dogs off-leash, which for this particular park is against the rules. The dogs are great. The people, not so much.

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 21, 2012 at 9:55 am | Permalink

      Thanks, Peg — and thanks for stopping by. Nice to see you here.

      And as someone who walks with a dog who is afraid of being approached by other dogs, I hear you about the owners who don’t observe off-leash rules. Frankie couldn’t care less about the “but he’s friendly” protestations from the owners. He wants those scary dogs out of his face.

  2. Posted May 21, 2012 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Love your article, Edie! If the targeted dogs truly were to blame, then surely the problem would be solved in locales that enforce BSL. Considering that hasn’t happened, it’s just so darn simple that the source is the owners. What a shame logic escapes so many!

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 21, 2012 at 10:41 am | Permalink

      Thanks, Kim. Logic — what a concept! 😉

  3. Posted May 21, 2012 at 11:04 am | Permalink

    Terrific post.

    I’ve seen the flip side of this issue which you alluded to with “kid friendly” breeds like labs. I’ve seen parents take absolutely no care about their child approaching Honey however they want to because she’s a Golden Retriever and she’s “not dangerous.”

    We’ve worked very hard with Honey and I want to believe she’s bullet proof around kids. But that is at least as much a result of the socialization and training we’ve done with her as her breed characteristics. Her mother is a pure-bred Golden Retriever too but I don’t see her being nearly as patient with grabby kids as Honey is.

    If I were walking a German Shepherd or Pitbull, I’m sure I’d see fewer parents encouraging their kids to put their faces right up to my dog and grab at fur.

    You’re so right that BSL distracts people from the real solution of education, education, education.

  4. Posted May 21, 2012 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    Very well-researched, Edie! I must say, it’s true what Pamela says, too, re kid-friendly dogs. Less “scary” dogs are accosted by kids because parents think they’re dangerous. In any case, a thought-provoking article said in a creative way.

  5. Posted May 21, 2012 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    Great article! I was so pleased to see my Sadie (who was one of Oh My Dog’s Positive PitBull Stories) as your photo. She worked very hard to become a smiley, happy & well-adjusted dog and to be used an example of a smiley Pittie and a positive image warms my heart. Thanks for including us in your wonderful and informative article!

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 21, 2012 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

      Thank you for identifying sweet Sadie as your pup! As I was searching around for good pitbull pics I looked at Maggie’s site but could see a link back to yours. You did a great job with her.

  6. Posted May 21, 2012 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Edie, yours is the most comprehensive article I’ve seen on this important topic. Kudos to you for such a thorough presentation, and without bias. I truly appreciate it. I’ll send other readers this way.

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 21, 2012 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

      Thank you! I was fortunate to have the resources of Tufts University Veterinary School at hand — not to mention the incentive of getting paid for my research. It’s not easy to get interviews like the ones I got if you’re “only” blogging about the topic.

  7. Posted May 22, 2012 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    I have recently been stunned to learn just how little training and resources most Animal Control Officers are given. The city enacts by-laws and then doesn’t give anyone the ability to properly enforce them. I don’t know why I was surprised. It’s just another example how animal issues are swept aside for “more important” things. For example, my municipality certainly puts a lot of money toward enforcing parking by-laws. If they even devoted an eighth of those efforts to animal control, I am sure many things would change.

    Thanks for another terrific and comprehensive article.

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 22, 2012 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

      Ah, the priorities our governments have — unbelievable. It’s hard to imagine that an expired parking meter is considered more important than dangerous dog laws.

  8. Posted May 22, 2012 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    Fantastic article, Edie! Breed discrimination is a challenge we face as we travel around the country with our German Shepherd. Owning one of these breeds definitely requires extra diligence when it comes to traveling. As an example, pit bulls are banned from the entire province of Ontario and can be confiscated and killed – even if they’re just passing through. It could be a very dangerous mistake to make.

    We also see a lot of people who don’t respect the rules and let their dogs off-leash in areas that can cause problems. It’s terribly frustrating when we’re working so hard to encourage more places to allow pets to have access. In the same vein, I’m seeing many more children politely asking to pet a dog before approaching them – it’s the adults I find to be more common offenders. How many times has someone said, “He’ll like me, I’m a dog person” when I tell them that Ty is afraid of strangers? It’s enough to drive me crazy! We resorted to fitting Ty with a vest that says “Please don’t pet me, I’m working” just so they’d keep their hands to themselves. Fortunately, it’s worked like a charm for our scaredy-dog.

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 22, 2012 at 6:16 pm | Permalink

      Thanks, Amy. I encounter “He’ll like me” people practically every day. I just want to slap them. It’s too hot for Frankie to wear a little vest half the year and I suspect, because he’s so small, no one would believe he’s gainfully employed 😉

  9. Posted May 26, 2012 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    Wonderful post, BSL bites. Any of breed of dog can be friendly, or unfriendly depending. In Jersey City where I live bully breeds are very popular and sadly with the exactly wrong kind of people. They want a big tough intimidating dog and as a result they do not socialize or neuter the dogs. The dogs are tied up and neglected and many become dog aggresive, as any breed will when not provide appropriate, exercise, training, and socialization. The local city shelter, liberty humane, is almost 100% pit bulls

    urban hounds

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 26, 2012 at 9:34 am | Permalink

      Thanks, Kate. It’s sad to see potentially sweet dogs ruined like that.

  10. Posted May 26, 2012 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    I agree with your points. I am a Malamute, another of the dangerous breeds- just not as high up on the public radar as are the pit bulls. Could I hurt you? Yes, but not by biting- by thinking you’re playing, chasing you and knocking you down to lick your face. That’s why I never go outside the fenced area without a leash and I am always supervised while outdoors. Period.

    We also have leash laws here, and they are enforced, but only when neighbors call animal control to complain. The problem is that when a neighbor makes the call, the other neighbors get mad at the neighbor and not the irresponsible owner. That makes absolutely no sense.

  11. Posted May 27, 2012 at 8:56 am | Permalink

    I am so glad you are publishing this article you wrote for Tufts to a larger audience. It is a milestone because it is so well researched and unbiased. This should be on the top of every journalist and politician’s reading list before even uttering the word breed ban.

    • Edie Jarolim
      Posted May 27, 2012 at 9:39 am | Permalink

      Thanks, Leo. You know, I was going to write and apologize because, when I originally asked for permission from Your Dog, it was to publish the piece on your blog and here I am publishing it on mine. But of course I know you are a generous person and it’s not about where the piece appears but about having it out there for people who want to learn about the stupidity of BSL.

      • Posted May 31, 2012 at 7:43 am | Permalink

        Your blog is the best place possible, the more exposure, the better 🙂

  12. Posted May 27, 2012 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Great article!

  13. Posted June 1, 2012 at 6:39 am | Permalink

    Really well said. Simpler (and more reasonable) solutions such as enforcing leash laws are put aside for these overblown BSL laws that won’t really fix the problem. I kind of like the idea of a dog owner’s license.

  14. Posted June 25, 2012 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

    Rather than calling it “breed” specific legislation, I think it should start being called what it truly is…Appearance Specific Legislation, or Characteristic Specific Legislation. Most of those involved with this issue are aware that it is nearly impossible to determine a dog’s breed by it’s appearance and nearly all of the BSL is written to include “the majority of physical traits”. It’s nothing more than profiling an animal based on how it looks. How anyone can decide a dog is dangerous based on it’s appearance is pure nonsense and doesn’t keep anyone safe. Thanks for a great article!

3 Trackbacks

  1. By The Dogs of War: Sergeant Stubby on May 28, 2012 at 5:54 am

    […] The Basics « Why BSL, Not Dogs, Should Be Banned […]

  2. By Lennox « SarahHosick.com on July 12, 2012 at 6:46 pm

    […] ASPCA on Breed Specific Legislation Edie Jarolim from “Will My Dog Hate” me on BSL […]

  3. By Pit bull myths | Have dog blog will travel on July 27, 2012 at 10:11 am

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>