kinds of drugs and its side effects

Banning Puppy Mills/Farms: What Can Twitter Do?

This is not a rhetorical question. It came to mind because someone on Twitter this morning suggested linking #woofwednesday with #banpuppyfarming or #banpuppymills campaigns.

For those not familiar with these weekly rituals, #woofwednesdays are a way to say hey to others in the dog tweeting community or to recommend them to others (the # indicates a trending topic). Linking these friendly barkouts to a topic of concern to ethical dog people makes sense; it will raise awareness.

That in itself is a good thing. I have followers in all kinds of pet-related (and other) businesses, some of whom might not know much about the topic, though it’s been well publicized by Oprah and others. If they become curious, all the better.

But most of us who would participate in this activity already know that puppy mills are evil. (Yes, I personally prefer the term puppy mills, and not just because I’m American and that’s standard usage in the U.S. Puppy farms sound almost idyllic; I picture verdant green meadows, dogs romping happily. Puppy mills, on the other hand, evoke the more accurate visions of impersonal mass production. William Blake helpfully linked the term “mills” to “dark” and “Satanic.”)

A couple of suggestions of further steps:

— Provide links to websites that discuss practical ways to get puppy mills banned. Personally, I’d prefer those without horrible pictures, or at least with the horrible pictures well hidden. I find I often close disturbing sites quickly, without reading the text. And if I don’t close them, I’m upset for a long time, which doesn’t make me very productive.

— Promote the idea of examining our followers on Twitter carefully before following back. Following implies endorsement, even if it’s a passive one. I try not to link to those (other than reputable breeders) who sells puppies on the internet. I say “try,” because it’s not always obvious at a quick glance at a profile. See my May 20 post for ways to recognize businesses that are a front for puppy mills.

This entry was posted in Animal Welfare and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Jenni
    Posted July 16, 2009 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    Wow, this would be great if we could pull it off. I try to be cautious about follows but it is hard in a way. Sharing information back and forth amongst the anipal crowd on Twitter might be a valuable resource. I really think puppy mills are a problem that could be put to an end if everyone tried though. I wonder what we could do as a group, there are an awful lot of us about.

    • admin
      Posted July 17, 2009 at 6:56 am | Permalink

      Since I wrote this post, I came across an article in Newsweek about a guy who is helping to get puppy mills closed through economic pressure. I’ve just put up a new post. I think Twitter could do a lot to get people organized to help with boycotts.

  2. Rebecca Boren
    Posted July 18, 2009 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Re the question of nomenclature: Surely most of us recall that Snoopy came from Daisy Hill Puppy Farm, a place of which he had very fond memories (even re-uniting with his littermates). Puppy mill is a much more appropriate description (and hearkens back to such well-known evils as the gin mills of London). I’ll apologize to people who turn organic wheat into good flour and shut up now.

    • admin
      Posted July 18, 2009 at 10:41 am | Permalink

      Actually, I didn’t know that about Snoopy’s origins — ssssh, don’t tell anyone, I was never a big Peanuts fan — but several people of the British persuasion have pointed out to me that the correct usage is Ban Puppy Farming, not puppy farms, so I sit corrected.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>